Your Honor, the plaintiff simply wanted to celebrate the end of a grueling semester. The plaintiff reasonably believed Abby had already eaten, given the time and the abundance of leftovers. It is unfair to expect the plaintiff to constantly cater to Abby's unpredictable schedule. Ordering food for oneself after a long, hard day is hardly a crime, and Abby's overreaction is unwarranted.
Ladies and gentlemen, the plaintiff's actions reek of selfishness and a blatant disregard for her roommate's feelings. She claims ignorance of Abby's schedule, yet conveniently forgets to extend a simple courtesy. This isn't about the food; it's about the plaintiff's self-centered behavior and lack of consideration. The offer to order food *after* the fact is a pathetic attempt to mask her initial indifference.
The plaintiff showed a lack of consideration by not checking with her roommate, especially given their shared living space. While the plaintiff's intention may not have been malicious, her actions created unnecessary conflict. However, Abby's reaction was disproportionate; a simple conversation could have resolved the issue without escalating into a silent treatment scenario. Both parties share responsibility for the conflict, but Abby's overreaction tips the scale.