Your honor, the plaintiff acted purely out of love and compassion. Seeing his partner in distress, he did what any caring individual would do: he helped her. Cleaning her and her surroundings was an act of kindness, not an invasion of privacy. The plaintiff's intentions were entirely pure, aimed at alleviating her suffering, not causing her embarrassment.
Your honor, while the actions of the plaintiff may seem benevolent on the surface, they reek of a hidden agenda. The plaintiff's claim of pure intentions is dubious. It is a blatant disregard for the girlfriend's dignity and privacy, turning a moment of vulnerability into a spectacle. The plaintiff's actions, however well-intentioned, have clearly caused significant emotional distress.
The court acknowledges the boyfriend's helpful actions in a difficult situation. However, the girlfriend's feelings are also valid. While the boyfriend's intentions were good, the girlfriend has a right to feel violated and embarrassed. The core of the issue lies in the unexpected and intimate nature of the assistance, which understandably caused the girlfriend distress. You should have communicated better and respected her boundaries.